No, and no we don't. You keep alleging that I have posted dodgy charts, and literally every point you made in that discussion I had to correct. There is no incentive for me to deal with someone who keeps alleging dishonesty because they don't have the cognitive capacity to understand the argument they're making.
“Economic growth in the UK has been founded on a number of unhealthy characteristics in the last decade or so. It has depended above all on large population increases based on uncontrolled mass migration. This has made the economy bigger, but not necessarily better for individual citizens, as shown by GDP per capita growth rates of two per cent or less – significantly weaker than in most decades since the Second World War. It has depended on moving a large number of people moving out of unemployment, which is good, but because the new jobs tend to be low paid it created a low productivity economy.”
But the Conservative Party is the party of "Middle England" and of The City and Human Quantitative Easing has made them a lot of money: much higher housing incomes from higher prices and rents and lower costs from lower wages for the gardeners, cleaners, delivery drivers, takeaway cooks, supermarket stackers etc. that "Middle England" uses.
Considering lower wage costs and higher housing profits a negative is "one nation torysm" and the Conservative Party and "Middle England" voters have not been "one nation tories" for decades now, they are committed "Blow you! I am alright Jack" thatcherites.
Us Yankees can borrow the phrase, too?
Sadly, you're welcome to it...
Hi. Can you unblock fidstats as we need to continue the conversation about that dodgy chart. Thx
No, and no we don't. You keep alleging that I have posted dodgy charts, and literally every point you made in that discussion I had to correct. There is no incentive for me to deal with someone who keeps alleging dishonesty because they don't have the cognitive capacity to understand the argument they're making.
I'm sorry you feel like this. Can I post my analysis here - maybe you will see it differently?
David Davis made a similar argument 9 years ago:
https://conservativehome.com/2016/07/14/david-davis-trade-deals-tax-cuts-and-taking-time-before-triggering-article-50-a-brexit-economic-strategy-for-britain/
“Economic growth in the UK has been founded on a number of unhealthy characteristics in the last decade or so. It has depended above all on large population increases based on uncontrolled mass migration. This has made the economy bigger, but not necessarily better for individual citizens, as shown by GDP per capita growth rates of two per cent or less – significantly weaker than in most decades since the Second World War. It has depended on moving a large number of people moving out of unemployment, which is good, but because the new jobs tend to be low paid it created a low productivity economy.”
But the Conservative Party is the party of "Middle England" and of The City and Human Quantitative Easing has made them a lot of money: much higher housing incomes from higher prices and rents and lower costs from lower wages for the gardeners, cleaners, delivery drivers, takeaway cooks, supermarket stackers etc. that "Middle England" uses.
Considering lower wage costs and higher housing profits a negative is "one nation torysm" and the Conservative Party and "Middle England" voters have not been "one nation tories" for decades now, they are committed "Blow you! I am alright Jack" thatcherites.